SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • India now has 1.76 lakh registered startups, 118 unicorns: FM Sitharaman  • Centre’s wheat procurement at MSP rises to three-year high  • RBI reduces inflation forecast to 3.7 pc for 2025-26  • RBI booster: EMIs, tenure set to come down for home loan borrowers  • RBI pegs India’s GDP growth at 6.5 pc for 2025-26 
Last updated: 27 Sep, 2014  

pizza-hutTHMB.jpg Pizza Hut to pay $10.8 mn in case of delivery driver collision

pizza-hut.jpg
   Top Stories
» RBI booster: EMIs, tenure set to come down for home loan borrowers
» RBI cuts repo rate by 50 basis points to 5.5 pc, changes policy stance to neutral
» Sensex, Nifty end in green ahead of RBI MPC decision
» PM Modi highlights role of Indian Railways in building a greener future
» DBT, Jan Dhan schemes revolutionised welfare delivery in India: FM Sitharaman
PR Newswire | 31 Jul, 2010

SAN DIEGO: A San Diego Superior Court jury has returned a verdict against Pizza Hut, Inc. for a total of $10.8 million. The case arose out of a November 9, 2008 collision between a Pizza Hut delivery driver and a mother and daughter on Clairemont Drive in San Diego, California. During the event, the delivery driver, 18 year old Nicole Fisk, drifted across lanes, and collided head on with the vehicle containing Olena Marie Novak and her daughter Shari Marie Novak. Olena, 87 years old at the time of the accident suffered a severe cervical fracture. Her daughter, Shari , suffered a catastrophic and permanent brain injury. She today requires 24 hour care.

After the crash, Pizza Hut claimed its delivery driver had suffered a seizure caused by previously undiagnosed epilepsy, causing the collision. "Sudden medical emergency" is a defense to negligence under California law.

Attorneys representing the Novak family countered that Pizza Hut's driver knew she had a previous medical condition, and that Pizza Hut should have done more to ensure she could safely work as a professional driver. The driver, Nicole Fisk, was only 18 years old at the time, had held a drivers license for only 3 months, and had a history of "staring spells" and "blackout" episodes prior to the incident.

The jury agreed, finding both that there was no "sudden medical emergency" excusing the driver's conduct. The jury awarded Olena Novak a total of $ 2.2 million and Shari Novak $8.6 million.

John Gomez of the Gomez Law Firm, attorney for the Novak family, stated, "This case was about corporate responsibility. Pizza Hut refused to accept its responsibility and the jury properly imposed it." Co-counsel Joseph Lavelle, of Wertz McDade Wallace Moot & Brower added, "Today this jury made the roads safer for all of us. Hopefully from now on, corporate employers will do what they need to do to make sure they hire only safe drivers to get beyond the wheel daily as part of their job." Both firms represented the family at trial.

SOURCE The Gomez Law Firm

 
Print the Page Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
84.35
82.60
UK Pound
106.35
102.90
Euro
92.50
89.35
Japanese Yen 55.05 53.40
As on 12 Oct, 2024
  Daily Poll
Do you think Indian businesses will be negatively affected by Trump's America First Policy?
 Yes
 No
 Can't Say
  Commented Stories
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter