Arun Goyal | 17 Oct, 2006
The CBEC notified on 5 October the procedures for large taxpayers to
register with special units in the metro cities to get special
facilities like transfer of excess CENVAT credit between units by way
of simple in house transfer challan. Registration also allows large
taxpayers to move intermediate goods between units for manufacture of
final products without excise bond based on simple in-house movement
challans. Large taxpayers are defined as those who pay excise duty or
service tax above Rs five crores or income tax over Rs 10 crores.
An LTU will be headed by an officer of the rank of Chief Commissioner
who will be drawn from Income Tax Office in the case of Mumbai and
Delhi who together are expected to account for six out of every 10 LTU.
The remaining LTUs at Kolkata, Chennai and Bangalore will be headed by
officers from the Customs and Excise service. Officers of the rank of
Additional Commissioner and below drawn from the excise department will
assist the Chief Commissioners at all places. Besides, there is the
concept of “client executive” who will be exclusively designated to
liaise with a particular company.
Only Bangalore is live:
As of now, only Bangalore LTU headed by an excise chief commissioner is
operational from 3 October 2006 and is inviting applications for
registration. It is believed that 30 or so applicants have asked for
the facilities including the engineering giants ABB and Volvo. This is
about one third of the Bangalore potential.
Chennai is expected to follow after seeing the Bangalore experience.
The big ones at Mumbai and Delhi will be taken up last towards the
middle of 2007. It is believed that there is an all India list of 1,000
entities who qualify for the LTU status. However, not all LTUs are
comfortable with centralization of control their manufacturing and
service tax affairs in the in the hands of the government. Registration
as LTU is, as of now, voluntary. The rules also allow a registered LTU
to opt out and deregister.
CBEC Circular promises:
The CBEC says that the consent form as specified in the annexure to the
excise notification 20/2006 dated 30 September will be verified within
seven days and registration as LTU will be issued. The consent form
asks for details of income tax, excise and service tax registration. In
addition, it calls for detail of actual tax payments on the three heads
of revenue from 04-05 onwards. Once the acceptance letter is received,
excise returns will be filed only with the LTUs. Refunds and rebate
claims will lie with the LTU. Audit of excise and service tax records
will be centralized.
Show cause
notices will be adjudicated at the LTU. Cases in which personal
hearings are already concluded will be decided by the jurisdiction
commissioner. All pending cases will be centralized and followed up
with the respective quasi judicial and judicial authorities only by the
LTU. Proof of export will be accepted only by the LTU.
The new procedure does not mess with duty payment. The centralization
of this is not mandatory, the duty can be paid in the jurisdiction
excise office also.
Trade facilitation measure may become another barrier:
The ill conceived LTU measure is bound to turn into a nightmare for the
department who may well see the well defined field formation lose their
power overnight. The large excise duty payers are already very well
known in the department and most of them follow the letter of the law.
Any attempt at evasion is detected very easily by the experienced
superintendents and inspectors, as much as two rupees of every ten
evaded is distributed to informers and departmental officer by way of
mercenary reward. The centralization of administration of far off
places in the port city of Mumbai where most head offices are located
will disorient the command and control structure of the excise
commissioners which starts at the range in the area of the factory and
goes up to the commissioner and then board with branches in
adjudication, enforcement and intelligence. Now an income tax chief
commissioner in Mumbai will co-ordinate with an excise commissioner
located in Shillong to collect tax. Income tax and excise are as
different as chalk and cheese, the first is a matter of accounting
while the second is a related to complex production processes.
At another level, the slow poisoning of the excise field formation by
the LTU is a good step. It will reduce the draconian powers enjoyed by
the excise officers in the field and give some breathing space to the
poor industry which continues to suffer the license permit raj even
today. The other segments of the industry with an all India character
should demand a similar one window service in a place like Delhi to get
the government machinery off its back.
The facilitation of all India movement without excise bond and movement
of credit between units is a welcome step. However, without a
corresponding measure on the sales tax/VAT side and the continuation of
the nuisance of CST, the invoice at the factory gate will not die as a
document even though it may not be required in cases of transfer of
goods.
Not much on income tax:
On the income tax side, there is not much change since the returns of
already being filed centrally at the registered office or head office
and there is a single assessment being made. It is claimed that returns
will be easier to file and refunds will be easier to claim with the
adoption of the LTU concept. As it is, the special officers are already
deputed for each big client; the new system cannot better the existing
one in this respect. The Chartered Accountants would not like to
disturb this system for no real advantage.