SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • Biden administration forgives $4.7 billion loans to Ukraine  • Women entrepreneurs driving innovation, growth in gem & jewellery sector: Smriti Irani  • India’s export outlook brighter as manufactured goods gain share: RBI  • India’s consumer durable makers to log 11-12 pc growth in FY25  • SEBI’s proposal on SME IPOs: striking a delicate balance 
Last updated: 19 Mar, 2016  

Tax.9.Thmb.jpg How 52,911 profitable Indian companies pay nil tax

Tax.9.jpg
   Top Stories
» India’s export outlook brighter as manufactured goods gain share: RBI
» Private consumption driving growth in Q3 with rural India taking lead: RBI
» Indian MSMEs create about 10 crore jobs in 15 months
» Indian prefer Q-commerce for daily essentials, physical stores for high-value buying
» Embedded finance to unlock $25 bn revenue opportunity for India’s platforms by 2030
Rohit Parakh | 19 Mar, 2016
"Why is it that subsidies going to the well-off are portrayed in a positive manner? Let me give you an example. The total revenue loss from incentives to corporate tax payers was over Rs.62,000 crore... I must confess I am surprised by the way words are used by experts on this matter. When a benefit is given to farmers or to the poor, experts and government officers normally call it a subsidy. However, I find that if a benefit is given to industry or commerce, it is usually an incentive or a subvention." -- Prime Minister Narendra Modi, February 15, 2016, Delhi.

So effective have some incentives been that companies making larger profits are now paying a lower rate of effective tax, reveals my analysis of national tax data over five years, specifically, the Statement of Revenue Impact of Tax Incentives under the Central Tax System.

Effective tax rate is the tax rate actually paid by companies on profits, calculated as tax actually paid divided by profits before tax. For instance, the effective tax rate for a company making a profit up to Rs.1 crore was 29.37 percent; while the corporate tax rate was 22.88 percent for those with profits greater than Rs.500 crore in 2014-15.

This means companies making smaller profits are competing in an unequal environment against bigger companies with substantial taxation benefits, with the gap in effective tax rates widening over the years.

In 2014-15, as many as 43.6 percent Indian companies made losses, 3 percent companies made no profit and 47.4 percent of the companies made profits up to Rs.1 crore, the data for 2014-15 show. Less than 6 percent of India’s companies recorded profits in excess of Rs.1 crore, according to the data. In addition, the proportion of loss-making companies has grown between 2010-11 and 2014-15.

Tax rates can even drop from 21.94 percent to 1.53 percent. As many as 52,911 companies made profits in 2014-15 and had nil effective tax rates or, in some cases, even below.

This happened because government incentives led to large declines in the effective tax rates for financial-leasing, sugar, cement, steel, mining contractors, power and energy, consultancy and paper companies.

In addition, the companies also used an accounting trick called as accelerated depreciation that allows for greater deduction in the price of an asset during its earlier years to reduce their effective tax rates.

Effective corporate tax rates for these industries were slashed from 2010-11. Consider finance-leasing companies, which provide assets (equipment, vehicle, software) on lease. Their effective tax rate fell from 21.94 percent in 2010-11 to 1.53 percent in 2014-15.

Similarly, the effective tax rate of consultancy services declined from 34.29 percent in 2012-13 (the peak value over the last five years) to 15.88 percent in 2014-15.

Tax rates are generally kept low when the government wants to increase supply and overall industry size or when the government wants to support industries in difficulty. Many industries have passed those support phases.

In 2015-16, India is expected to have produced excess sugar for its sixth consecutive year. Similarly, a global slowdown has led to an oversupply of cement. Yet, these industries have benefitted from falling effective-tax rates.

Had the effective-tax rates on some of such industries been the same as the 2010-11 rates, additional cumulative tax collected over the last four years from them would have totalled Rs.39,000 crore. This is based on an assumption that the tax rates would have had no impact on the profits before tax.

Public companies paid higher effective tax rates (25.03 percent) than private companies (23.36 percent) in 2014-15. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley, in his budget speech last February, said the government would phase out tax exemptions and deductions, a move that would bring clarity to the tax regime.

While effective tax rates rose between 2012-13 and 2014-15, many exemptions remain, especially for larger companies.

For instance, corporates have a statutory tax rate of 33.84 percent, which they must pay on profits. However, the effective tax rate in 2014-15 was 24.67 percent. Although this rate is higher than it was in 2013-14 (23.22 percent), incentives to companies still cost the government thousands of crores.

The government provided the corporate sector Rs.65,067 crore in tax breaks or exemptions in 2014-15 and is expected to forego Rs.68,710 crore in 2015-16. Compare this with the money set aside for agriculture and farmers’ welfare, Rs.35,984 crore, and the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, Rs.38,500 crore.

(In arrangement with IndiaSpend.org, a data-driven, non-profit, public interest journalism platform. Rohit Parakh is a social investor based in London and supports a number of India-centric development initiatives in policymaking, governance, alternate media and social enterprise. The views expressed are those of IndiaSpend. Parakh can be reached out at rohit.2691@gmail.com)
 
Print the Page Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

It is not bad...
Nitin Da | Wed Mar 23 04:25:09 2016
The incentives are given to encourage industries do production in India. It is inappropriate to term it as a reason to for low tax payment. When giving the incentive itself , there is a reasoning given to it. Why decry now that it is not good ? These companies generate business , do exports , make in India , locate to backward regions and so much more. They are entitled to tax incentives given and claimed legitimately. No need to be over socialistic and kill industriousness .

  Re: It is not bad...
debashree M | Tue Mar 29 09:21:09 2016
totally agree


 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
84.35
82.60
UK Pound
106.35
102.90
Euro
92.50
89.35
Japanese Yen 55.05 53.40
As on 12 Oct, 2024
  Daily Poll
Will the new MSME credit assessment model simplify financing?
 Yes
 No
 Can't say
  Commented Stories
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter