Absence of Big Idea leaves Congress without direction

Top Stories

»	PLI scheme has attracted Rs 1.46 lakh crore investment, created 9.5 lakh jobs
»	Centre pays Rs 4,820 crore to 2.75 lakh farmers for pulses under MSP scheme
»	India's private sector growth surges to 4-month high in Dec: Report
»	Govt inks Rs 13,500 crore deal for 12 Sukhoi fighter jets with HAL in big boost to self-reliance
»	Over 2.2 crore women-owned MSMEs registered under govt scheme in last 4 years: Minister

Amulya Ganguli | 28 May, 2012
Blaming factionalism for the Congress's recent electoral setbacks, as Sonia Gandhi has done, can be regarded as a somewhat facile explanation, considering that internal rifts have been a part of the party's genes dating back a century to the clashes between Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Gopal Krishna Gokhale, between Mahatma Gandhi and Subhas Chandra Bose and between Indira Gandhi and the so-called "syndicate", represented by the old guard in the Congress at that time.

Besides these confrontations between the heavyweights at the national level, there were innumerable relatively minor tiffs lower down the scale as between A.K. Antony and K. Karunakaran in Kerala.

But it is necessary to remember that none of these seriously undermined the Congress. On the contrary, it became an overpowering political presence at the time of independence and for at least two decades afterwards, and also in the 1970s and 1980s. There were two reasons for this remarkable achievement. One was the presence of charismatic leaders at the top, whose popular appeal swept away the cobwebs of groupism, and the other was the articulation of the Big Idea, which represented the party's vision.

Arguably, it is the absence of these two factors which has led to the party's present plight and, consequently, allowed the petty groupies to proliferate. It cannot be gainsaid that unless the Congress finds a sense of direction in terms of an idealistic outlook, it will continue to flounder.

However, the Congress' travails are all the more surprising because it is the only party which has been able to reorient its policies in sync with the changing times. Neither the Left nor the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), its two main opponents, has been able to do so. The comrades, for instance, remain stuck in the days of Soviet hegemony when anti-Americanism was the flavour of the day. They seem to take no cognisance of the fact of communism's terminal decline.

The BJP, on its part, is unable to break free of its pro-Hindu Jana Sangh past or of its servile relationship with the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS), the head of the Hindu supremacist saffron brotherhood. As a result, it is virtually an untrustworthy alien entity so far as the country's minorities are concerned - Muslims and Christians - and also for the liberal-minded Hindus.

In contrast, the Congress has undertaken major ideological changes. For a start, it is gingerly sidestepping the Nehruvian concept of socialism even if this Fabian ideal is associated with one of the party's greatest leaders. Along with socialism, another Nehruvian policy initiative of the 1950s - non-alignment - has been discarded. In their place, the Congress has chosen market-driven economic policies and tilted towards America, the socialists' bugbear.

It isn't that there hasn't been resistance from within the party to these changes. There are sizeable sections which still hanker for a "socialistic pattern of society", which the Congress's 1955 resolution envisaged. These groups are also wary of too close a relationship with America, for which Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is held responsible. Even then, consensus is gradually emerging that there can be no definitive turning away from economic reforms or from a close friendship with America.

However, it is the continuing half-heartedness about these initiatives which is responsible for the Congress giving the impression of being unsure about its future course of action or being able to convince the people of whatever it has achieved. It is the sense of being stuck in a limbo, as it were, which is hurting the party. Nothing showed the effect of this purposelessness than the recent Delhi municipal election results where the BJP succeeded in retaining its hold despite the achievements of the city's Congress government in making the national capital one of the country's most liveable cities.

Yet, although the Congress raised its tally of seats from 67 in 2007 to 78 this time, the electorate was unwilling to repose full faith in it apparently because of its perceived governance deficit at the centre and entanglement in numerous scams that have been played up in the media. It was the same in Uttar Pradesh where the Congress gained the most in terms of a rise in vote share - 14.02 percent in 2012 compared to 8.63 percent in 2007 - a 5.5 percent jump compared to a 4.5 percent increase for the Samajwadi Party. The impressiveness of the gain can be seen from the fact that the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) lost 4.2 percent of its vote share and the BJP lost two percent. But the Congress still remains very much a marginal player.

The surge in the Congress' popularity in 2009, which took the party's Lok Sabha seats to above 200, was the result of the belief that the party was about to implement the Big Idea of economic reforms. Instead, not only is the party dithering, it is even turning to state paternalism redolent of a controlled economy by favouring dole-oriented programmes like the rural employment scheme and the proposed hugely expensive food security bill, which will make a mockery of fiscal discipline. These are ideas which will not impress the new generation.

*The views expressed by the author in this feature are entirely his/ her own and do not necessarily reflect the views of SME Times.