SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • Adani Group to invest Rs 57,575 crore in Odisha  • 'Dollar Distancing' finally happening? Time for India to pitch Rupee as credible alternative: SBI Ecowrap  • 49% Indian startups now from tier 2, 3 cities: Jitendra Singh  • 'India ranks 3rd in global startup ecosystem & number of unicorns'  • LinkedIn lays off entire global events marketing team: Report 
Last updated: 27 Sep, 2014  

murli-manohar-joshiTHMB.jpg FDI in retail will harm SMEs: BJP

sme-retail2011.jpg
   Top Stories
» 49% Indian startups now from tier 2, 3 cities: Jitendra Singh
» 'India ranks 3rd in global startup ecosystem & number of unicorns'
» Tripura exported over 9K tonnes of pineapples in 2 years
» CPI inflation eases to 6.71% in July, IIP falls to 12.3%
» Rupee depreciates 12 paise to close at 79.64 against US dollar
SME Times News Bureau | 21 Nov, 2011
Threatening to launch a nationwide agitations against the central government's move to allow foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and Public Accounts Committee chairman Murli Manohar Joshi Sunday said it would harm country's Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs).

Speaking to the media in Bhubaneswar, Joshi said the Indian retail market has been growing on its own and the sector does not require FDI or big domestic investment.

He said if the FDI in multi-brand retail was allowed, foreign companies like Walmart and Carrefour will sell essential commodities like vegetables and foodgrain.

"The experience all over the world is totally against it. Where ever these people have gone, the competition has destroyed the small shopkeepers and it has resulted in a total loss of jobs," he said.

"India already is having a large number of unemployed people. If this big capital in retail comes, there will be further addition to unemployment," he said, adding retail was the second largest employment generating area.

He also accused the government of spreading false propaganda that it will help the farmers and producers.

"Neither the consumers are benefited, nor the farmers. This is a false propaganda. There is absolutely no evidence that farmers have been benefited," he said.

If the farmers in other agriculture producing countries have benefited, it's because they have been heavily subsidised by their respective governments. "In India, farmers are not subsidised to that extent" he added.

"I challenge the government to prove that it benefits the farmers or the consumers," Joshi said, adding his party has planned to protest the move across the country and in the parliament.
 
Print the Page Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
66.20
64.50
UK Pound
87.50
84.65
Euro
78.25
75.65
Japanese Yen 58.85 56.85
As on 13 Aug, 2022
  Daily Poll
PM Modi's recent US visit to redefine India-US bilateral relations
 Yes
 No
 Can't say
  Commented Stories
» GIC Re's revenue from obligatory cession threatened(1)
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter