SME Times is powered by   
Search News
Just in:   • Tariff war: Korean won dips to lowest level since 2008 global financial crisis  • Tariff shock indicates 25bps rate cut, RBI stance may turn ‘accommodative’: Report  • PM Mudra Yojana Hits ₹32.61 Lakh Cr in Loans to 52 Crore Beneficiaries in 10 Years  • Sensex, Nifty tank over 4 pc as global trade war fear rises   • They're dying to make deal: Trump stands firm on 'reciprocal tariffs' 
Last updated: 29 Jul, 2024  

Mobile9.Thmb.jpg No permission fees for mobile towers in Gujarat

Mobile9.jpg
   Top Stories
» Tariff shock indicates 25bps rate cut, RBI stance may turn ‘accommodative’: Report
» PM Mudra Yojana Hits ₹32.61 Lakh Cr in Loans to 52 Crore Beneficiaries in 10 Years
» Sensex, Nifty tank over 4 pc as global trade war fear rises
» Indian stock market crashes amid US reciprocal tariff fears
» PM Modi offers UPI link to BIMSTEC nations as booster shot for trade, tourism
SME Times News Bureau | 07 May, 2010
The Gujarat High Court Thursday ruled that municipal corporations and municipalities in the state could not levy annual permission fee and installation charges on mobile communication towers, as this violated their powers under the constitution and Municipalities Act.

A division bench of Justice D.A. Mehta and Justice H.N. Devani ruled that levy and recovery of annual permission fees and installation charges on mobile telecommunication towers in the areas covered under municipal corporations/municipalities in Gujarat has been struck down "as being ultra vires the provisions of Article 265 of the Constitution of India as well as provisions of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963."

Bharti Infratel Ltd had challenged the demand note issued by the municipalities and municipal corporations asking it to pay permission fees, administrative penalties and rent for its mobile towers. The company also challenged the amended resolution passed by the urban development and urban housing department of the state government.

Its counsel, Viraj Fozdar and Shalin Mehta, stated that the resolution was subject matter of challenge before the high court. It was further submitted that the high court, in its judgment in Indus Towers Ltd vs the state of Gujarat April 22, had quashed and set aside the resolution passed by the authorities.

The bench said that as the court had already rendered its judgment in similar cases hence the petition is allowed and the demand by the municipal bodies cannot be sustained. 
 
Print the Page
Add to Favorite
 
Share this on :
 

Please comment on this story:
 
Subject :
Message:
(Maximum 1500 characters)  Characters left 1500
Your name:
 

 
  Customs Exchange Rates
Currency Import Export
US Dollar
84.35
82.60
UK Pound
106.35
102.90
Euro
92.50
89.35
Japanese Yen 55.05 53.40
As on 12 Oct, 2024
  Daily Poll
Do you think Indian businesses will be negatively affected by Trump's America First Policy?
 Yes
 No
 Can't Say
  Commented Stories
 
 
About Us  |   Advertise with Us  
  Useful Links  |   Terms and Conditions  |   Disclaimer  |   Contact Us  
Follow Us : Facebook Twitter